So last night, I was messing around with a lot of server side stuff, apache2 and subversion. I figured after so many years (and years?) of CVS use, it was time to do an upgrade to a more modern source control software.
I got apache2 installed, added in the webdav mod, enabled server certificates and all that running fine. Installed subversion but couldn't seem to access my repository. Very aggravating.
Then it occurred to me -- why am I spending all this time to get subversion running when my whole plan is to use a modern source control package?
Enter in the new contenders: Git, Mercurial and Bazaar. I ruled bazaar out for no particularly good reasons and focused on Git and Mercurial. There are a lot of hard hitters using both technologies and in the end, I chose git. Git has the benefits of being similar to cvs at the command line and I found Linus Torvalds arguments very compelling when researching these tools.
Later this week, I'll get my house repository running and update my progress.
I got apache2 installed, added in the webdav mod, enabled server certificates and all that running fine. Installed subversion but couldn't seem to access my repository. Very aggravating.
Then it occurred to me -- why am I spending all this time to get subversion running when my whole plan is to use a modern source control package?
Enter in the new contenders: Git, Mercurial and Bazaar. I ruled bazaar out for no particularly good reasons and focused on Git and Mercurial. There are a lot of hard hitters using both technologies and in the end, I chose git. Git has the benefits of being similar to cvs at the command line and I found Linus Torvalds arguments very compelling when researching these tools.
Later this week, I'll get my house repository running and update my progress.
Я извиняюсь, но, по-моему, Вы допускаете ошибку. Могу отстоять свою позицию. Пишите мне в PM.
ReplyDelete